Выберите слово которое не относится к теме “Banking”.: ответ на тест 933292 - Английский язык

Выберите слово, которое не относится к теме “Banking”.

Выберите слово, которое не относится к теме «Law».

Выберите слово, которое не относится к теме “Professions”.

Прочитайте текст и определите, какой из заголовков соответствует тексту.
Yesterday afternoon thieves stole £500 from a post office in Preston, Lancashire. Police do not have a good description of the two men, but they know that they escaped in a red Ford Cortina. This information came from an 11-year-old boy, Charlie Carrack.

Прочитайте текст и определите, какой из заголовков соответствует тексту.
A man was brought up before a judge and charged with burglary. He had cut a hole in the side of a tent, had put his head, his right arm and his right shoulder through the hole and had stolen several things belonging to the people sleeping in the tent.
The lawyer of the defendant said that as the man had not entered the tent, he couldn’t be convicted of burglary and ought to be set free. The judge however said that while the man as a whole had not committed burglary, his head, his right arm and his right shoulder had.
The jury brought in a verdict of guilty against these parts, which were sentenced to two years imprisonment with hard labour in the state prison. All the rest of the man was found not guilty and discharged.

Прочитайте текст и определите, какой из заголовков соответствует тексту.
Society has only recently addressed the problems of crimes made possible by the computer revolution.
One problem involves the stealing of valuable information from other persons’ computers. Recall that larceny is “the wrongful taking of the property of others”. This traditional definition of the crime made it difficult to prosecute those who steal computer data for two reasons. First, many courts concluded that there was not a “taking” if an intruder merely copied the information in the computer. Second, even if an intruder copied and erased computer information, some courts concluded that there was no taking of “personal property” but only the loss of electrical impulses, which no one really owns.